 |
O&P Research: A Question of Quality—or Quantity?
By Judith Otto Research requires three factors: expertise, time,
and money, points out Darrell Clark, CO, director of Orthotics,
Rancho Los Amigos, Downey, California.
 |
Darrell Clark, CO |
|
"Many baccalaureate programs that are
university-based often have resources in terms of faculty members
who have PhDs and outside expert help from kinesiologists, for
example," Clark says. "O&P certificate courses often don't have
those kinds of resources, unless they are based at a major
university. Even in the university setting, there are limits:
budgetary restraints often don't allow the necessary specialized
curriculum space; and even educators don't always have a strong
background in grant writing to gain funding."
And it's no surprise, Clark agrees, that one can't do research
without funding. "In a typical individual practice, where
reimbursements are being pushed ever lower, it's hard to justify
the cost. And since research is expensive, that investment needs to
be recouped, usually in higher charges for patient service."
He points out that the California state government is looking at
a $30 billion deficit; state residents are looking at decreased
services and increased taxes--which may reflect a nationwide
problem shared by 20-30 other states that may also be in dire
financial straits. "That O&P is perceived as not important
enough for the indigent population to deserve," Clark notes, "is
reflected in mass proposals to eliminate O&P benefits from
Medicaid services in a number of states." In this kind of climate,
it is hardly realistic to suppose that funding for O&P research
will materialize without dedicated, persistent, and cogent
advocacy, Clark warns. Manufacturers can and do finance research in
the form of product development, but inarguably they have a vested
interest. They "want a reward somewhere down the road," Clark
says.
Nerrolyn Ford, PhD, BP&O, British Columbia
Institute of Technology (BCIT), Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada,
agrees that the problem is not a question of quality in O&P
research.
"I'm not sure that it's fair to say that the quality of research
within P&O isn't so good--I would say that it's the quantity.
Traditionally, we have not been an academic profession, and it's
the academics that typically have the skills to do the research.
It's only been in the last ten years that we've really started to
look at increasing the level of education in P&O, and we're
still in the very early stages.
 |
Nerrolyn Ford, PhD |
|
"It's a big area, and a lot of research needs to
be done, so other well-established professions that are equipped
with the necessary research skills have taken the initiative," Ford
continues. "They have these skills because the level of
qualification for these professions is higher--the educational
background that they have includes some research training and some
major research projects, which typically in the past we have not
included in our educational system."
In Canada, Ford explains, there are three well-established
schools teaching O&P--all at the diploma level: BCIT,
Montmorency in Quebec, and George Brown College, Toronto, Ontario.
All three schools have been established for about 20 years.
What can we do to get where we need to be?
"We're on the right track," said Ford. "At the moment, we're
seeing a wave of schools increasing the level of education. I don't
think that every prosthetist or orthotist needs to have a higher
level of education. We don't need a profession full of researchers;
it's not what we're really about. But we must have opportunities
for those people who wish to go on to higher levels of education,
e.g. Masters degrees and PhDs.--and those degrees have to be in
prosthetics and orthotics, not kinesiology or biomechanics."
P&O is also lacking in opportunities for graduate program
alumni to do research, Ford points out. "There are no established
research facilities where they can work once they've graduated. So
after they get these degrees, they work in clinical practice again,
because that's all that's available." BCIT has two PhD programs in
P&O. "We're the only two in Canada," says Ford. "We do some
applied research and development; I have a grant, as well."
How hard are grants to get?
"People do need the skills to write the grants--and I'm fairly
new to this as well," Ford says. "I'm looking for mentors to help
me improve my research--and where do you find them? There are very
few prosthetists and orthotists with this kind of research
experience--often you have to go outside the profession."
And how does one get a grant?
Gary G. Bedard, CO, clinical marketing manager,
Becker Orthopedic, Troy, Michigan, was chairman of the American
Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP) Fabrication Sciences
Society (FSS) when he wrote his proposal for a research study in
April 2001: A Preliminary Report on Measuring the Rate of
Polypropylene Recrystallization After Clinical Thermoforming
Through the Use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry.
"In essence," Bedard explained, "in the thermoforming process,
there is a certain level of controversy regarding proper cooling at
the end of the process. Improper cooling can actually weaken the
polypropylene. Findings showed a decrease in strength of up to 16
percent." (Hence, this was a topic of interest and applicable
value.)
The FSS receives an annual budget which is typically used for
conducting workshops at the national meeting. However, last year
the FSS board decided to approach the Academy with the idea that
practitioners could request grants instead, Bedard explains.
Bedard's grant was the first awarded by the Academy, and he
presented his findings at the 2002 Academy meeting. "They told me I
was the first one who had ever applied for a grant to do research,"
he said. The Academy is now prepared to consider similar funding
requests to support research directly applicable to O&P, Bedard
noted. "Since this grant was awarded through the auspices of the
FSS, I look at it as potentially being a model that the board could
use to stimulate activity in the various societies. If
practitioners know small grants are available to conduct research,
it might prompt them to be more involved with these societies."
Bedard agrees that most O&P research is done by those
outside the field, and, like others, believes one of the major
reasons is that there aren't enough graduate programs in O&P.
Research is not typically the focus of a baccalaureate program, but
rather, of a graduate degree program, Bedard notes. "Consequently,
because we don't yet have a PhD program, it will be years before we
have a body of graduates in the field who are in institutional
settings and who can write the grants, bring in the funding,
etc."
Meanwhile, Bedard suggests, the Academy can support O&P
research either by providing grants to PhDs who have an O&P
clinician on their research team or by developing a road map to
help the O&P practitioner/researcher in conducting his/her
research with expert help and guidance.
 |
The machining center is integral in prototyping. Photo courtesy of Fillauer Inc. |
|
Gerald Stark, BSME, CP, FAAOP, director of
education & technical support, Fillauer Inc., Chattanooga,
Tennessee, has also served as a prosthetic instructor at
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, so he understands both
sides of the research picture. "About 10 percent of what most
researchers do is directly applicable to product development," he
says. "True research is answering more altruistic questions.
However, if we don't produce products, we're not successful."
However, research labs can attempt to answer questions that
increase the overall body of knowledge, which may or may not evolve
into products, he noted.
Manufacturers face different challenges, he points out. "We
gamble that what we do will develop into a viable profit. We try to
minimize our risk by using marketing to guess well. We look at
L-Codes and see what has been successful--and what's missing.
Certainly we'd like to see more unique products, but working with
smaller quantities of 100 or less limits our return on investment
for new products."
Then there's that troubling question that Stark also attempts
to answer: What IS research?
"In our case, it's tinkering, inventing, trying to see what
works," he says. "Research labs may frown on that method because
their goals are different. At Fillauer, we have been doing research
of the tinkering variety, just like the average O&P
practitioner must tinker to develop solutions for his patient.
More practitioners would like to tinker, but need partnerships
with machinists and engineers to do so," he adds. Manufacturers are
investing more in research and product development, and that money
usually translates into what products people will see in the
future, Stark said. Manufacturers also are developing symbiotic
partnerships with research labs that help both groups: "Products
are developed on sound scientific concepts, and research labs can
show how studies directly benefit the profession, increasing their
chances for funding."
Ideas for research come from everywhere, Stark finds. About half
of Fillauer's product ideas are generated by people outside the
company. At seminars, he makes it a point to ask practitioners what
is the one thing they wish they had--a perfect springboard into
practical research directions.
Professionals involved in O&P come from a variety of
backgrounds, thus seeing patient needs from a variety of
perspectives, Stark notes. "This creates some interesting
discussions, since we are engineers, anatomists, kinesiologists,
athletic trainers, physical therapists, and occupational
therapists."
John Michael, MEd, CPO, FISPO, FAAOP, president
of CPO Services, Portage, Indiana, recently reflected on the need
for more O&P research in his "Corner" at oandp.com. Reporting
on the 2002 Annual Meeting of the UK National Member Society of the
International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO), Michael
commented, ""&As we move further into the 21st century, the
plethora of similar choices and conflicting manufacturers' claims
strengthen my conviction that EBP (evidence-based practice) is the
best available tool to determine what's best for our patients and
to add more credibility to our practices. I would encourage every
P&O society to follow the lead of our UK colleagues in this
regard, as good research is quite difficult to conduct and moves
knowledge forward in very small steps. Practitioners need to start
doing clinical research now to insure that the next generation of
practitioners will have a sufficiently large body of evidence to
face tomorrow's challenges." 
Table Of Contents - May 2003
|
|
