 |
A New Paradigm of Postoperative Amputation Care
By Miki Fairley Michael Pinzur, MD, has a guiding philosophy: "Think
outside the box." In discussing the American healthcare system,
Pinzur says, "It's a bad system, but it's the best around." To
arrive at the ultimate goal of optimal patient outcomes, Pinzur
believes the healthcare professional should look through a
wide-angled lens at the entire picture, rather than narrowly focus
on one aspect - and think outside the box.
Considering the whole-picture view is important in
strategizing what is the best care for each individual patient,
Pinzur believes.
Pinzur, who is a professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and
Rehabilitation at Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood,
Illinois, urges, "Look at the biology, the technology, and the
system," - and how these apply to patient care. "Think about the
whole process, not just the specifics."
Biology can apply to both your patient's medical
condition, and treatment goals - and how these can be best
achieved. Technology involves prosthetic devices to help
achieve treatment goals. However the system and factoring
it into your patient care is highly complex and involves what is
available to the patient in care options and what is affordable for
him.
In discussing amputation postoperative care with The O&P
EDGE, Pinzur discussed that marvelous weight bearing organ,
the foot, with its 26 bones (the feet contain about one quarter of
all the bones in the human body) to accept weight bearing, absorb
shock, and adapt to differing terrain. In a lower-limb amputation,
all this is lost, with only a limited ability to replace it.
"With an amputation, we now have a much smaller surface area and
limited cushioning and adaptability compared to that organ uniquely
adapted for weight bearing - the foot," says Pinzur. So a new
development he would like to see is something that would bring the
residual limb up to the level of the natural foot.
If it weren't for the problem of infection, Pinzur feels that the
osseointegration technique pioneered by Rickard Branemark, MD, is
the best current solution, since it eliminates stabilization and
interface issues.
Even though the ideal solution doesn't yet exist, the first step
toward better postoperative care and successful prosthesis use
begins with good surgery, Pinzur points out. "I'd like to see
surgeons do better surgery and understand the principles of how you
create a terminal organ of weight bearing. If the prosthetist gets
a bad limb, he or she spends a significant amount of effort and
design adapting to the problems. When prosthetists get a good limb,
it makes their job easier and they can take more advantage of new
technology."
Pinzur routinely performs bone-bridge surgeries on traumatic
amputees and believes the technique does create a better residual
limb for weight bearing and prosthetic use. However, he stresses
the need for scientific evidence to support treatment theories. "I
have my theories as to how people bear weight, but its not proved.
We don't yet know through scientific studies how patients
bear weight in a prosthesis. The studies that we have are based on
computer simulations, so we really don't know how people actually
bear weight."
Pinzur continues, "I'm a proponent of immediate weight bearing, but
there is no evidence that in the long term people who immediately
weight bear do better than those who start their weight bearing
later. Those of us who believe in it say people don't decondition
as much, don't get contractures, and receive psychological
benefits. But this is not evidence-based."
Prosthetic Priorities
After surgery, prosthetic technology and design enter the
picture. The most important need is for an intimate fit, Pinzur
stresses. He looks at a prosthesis from a fresh perspective. "Think
of the prosthesis as a big shoe. Think how you feel if the shoe is
sloppy, loose, and doesn't fit right. Also, many people like gym
shoes better than leather shoes because they're softer and more
cushioned. So you want a prosthesis that is snug, cushioned, stays
attached, and effectively transmits the load of weight
bearing."
Applying the shoe concept to an immediate postoperative prosthesis
(IPOP), Pinzur notes that the classic IPOP includes a plaster cast.
"Now would you rather walk in a plaster shoe or a soft, cushioned
shoe?"
An intimate fit is highly important, since shear forces - rather
than pressure as such - are what cause skin breakdown, Pinzur says.
"What happens when you wear hard leather shoes and your heel starts
moving up and down? You get a blister. So if the limb pistons up
and down in the socket, that produces shear which breaks down the
wound. So what we want in an IPOP is one that will rapidly adapt to
changes in the limb's geographic shape and volume, dissipate weight
over the whole surface area, and is cushioned and intimately
fitting to protect the wound from shear and pressure."
Weight Bear Early - Or Not?
Taking a big-picture view has led Pinzur to conclusions that, at
first glance, may seem counterintuitive. For instance, he believes
in early weight bearing for older patients with diabetes or other
medical conditions more so than with young, otherwise healthy
persons with amputations due to trauma, tumors, or congenital
anomalies.
"Statistically, when you do a BK amputation on a person with
diabetes and vascular disease, they have a high likelihood of being
dead in two years. When I do an amputation on a little old lady
with diabetes, I don't want her to have to sit around in a
wheelchair for 50 percent of the time she has left. She'll get weak
and have flexion contractures and won't become a prosthetic user."
Although early ambulation increases the risk of wound breakdown and
complications, Pinzur would rather take this risk and have these
types of patients ambulate early and have more quality of
life.
However, Pinzur sees the opposite situation with healthy, younger
amputees. They have the probability of becoming long-term
prosthetic users, so an optimum residual limb is a prime
consideration. "I'm aggressive with IPOPs for the older people. But
I can do the same exact surgery on a 24-year-old who's had a
motorcycle accident, and I tend to not have him fit with a
prosthesis right away. What's the difference? It's best not to run
the risk of wound problems, because it's crucial for him in the
long term to have an excellent residual limb." The recovery
timeline from surgery to prosthetic use with the timing of each
step in the process is different with these two different patient
populations, Pinzur notes.
Timeline, Team Considerations
A team environment, such as is generally found in university
medical centers, ideally provides a seamless transition from
surgery to prosthetic fitting. It's about the timeline - what has
to be achieved at each step before going on to the next step - and
looking at the process as a whole. The timeline would vary
depending on the patient - and the desired end result. Vascular
surgeons perform about 80-90 percent of all amputations in the US,
since most amputations are due to dysvascular conditions, Pinzur
observes. Successful surgical wound healing is the vascular
surgeons goal. "However, I feel that amputation is just the first
step in the process," he says. "To me, the end result is successful
prosthetic use."
Recovery timelines, with their related treatment algorithms and
decision trees, would be much different, for instance, for the
older dysvascular patient than a youngster undergoing an elective
transtibial amputation to correct a congenital anomaly. Says
Pinzur, "If we think of an overall timeline, algorithm, and
decision tree - the biology of the healing, the technology of the
prosthesis, together with the timeline for recovery - we have
established a whole new paradigm for addressing these issues."
Impacts on IPOP Use
However, the "real-world" environment - reimbursement issues,
health professionals' "territorial" issues, and allocation of
limited resources - can derail the ideal scenario. If a surgeon
puts an IPOP on a patient after surgery, that goes into their DRG
and the hospital eats the cost, which doesn't sit well with
hospital administrators. "I've taken a patient that could be
profitable for the hospital and made them a money loser," Pinzur
says.
Also, insurance plans tend to pay for only a limited number of
prostheses, so if the surgeon puts an IPOP on a patient in the
operating room and the plan only pays for one prosthesis, the
insurance won't pay for the definitive prosthesis.
A vascular surgeon, who is mainly interested in successful wound
healing, would not likely promote a technique that could endanger
the wound. When the vascular surgeon thinks the wound is safe, he
sends the patient to a physiatrist. If the physiatrist prescribes
an IPOP or early postoperative prosthesis (EPOP) and there's a
wound complication, the physiatrist gets the blame, and the surgeon
has to fix the damage, so the physiatrist would be hesitant to use
an IPOP and take the risk.
External regulations are another factor. "If your mother has a hip
replacement, wouldn't you like her to go to a rehab center?" Pinzur
asks rhetorically. However, with Medicare, if you are a surgeon
doing a certain number of hip replacements, and you send more than
a small percentage to a rehab center, the center may be
de-certified.
Allocating Limited Resources
Medical care is expensive, and allocation of resources is a
large issue. No individual, organization, or even nation has
unlimited resources, and choices have to be made, Pinzur points
out. The public has to decide what it wants, look at the big
picture, and consciously consider how to allocate available
resources. Pinzur draws an analogy with an individual considering
buying a BMW or a Chevette. Both will fulfill his basic
transportation needs. However, he may want the BMW and decide to
buy it and live in a smaller house. Or he may decide to buy a
bigger house and drive the Chevette. His priorities will determine
his allocation of his resources.
Ideal Scenario
In the ideal scenario, professionals in each rehab discipline
would be on the same page, work as a team, be unaffected by issues
of practice territory and income relative to other disciplines,
regulations that impede the process, resource allocation issues,
and be driven by the recovery timeline and the desired outcome for
the patient. Pinzur sums it up concisely: "A lot of our failures
are due to the failure of our systems. If we could make our systems
better, we could make a lot of our patients' recoveries
better." 

Table Of Contents - April 2005
 |
Focus on IPOPs, EPOPs: Does Early Mobility Benefit Amputees?
“Although amputations have been performed for centuries as a lifesaving procedure, the current protocols for care of the
person undergoing this life-altering surgical procedure, in some cases, may not reflect the complete and active lifestyle in
which the amputee can now engage."
Feature
|
|
 |
Kiwi: An RRD Innovation
Feature
- Exclusively Online
|
|
 |
Flo-Tech: Expanding Options
Feature
- Exclusively Online
|
|
 |
A New Paradigm of Postoperative Amputation Care
Feature
|
|
 |
OA Knee Bracing Relieves Pain, Reduces Medication Need
Feature
|
|
 |
Soldier Gets New Prosthetic Design
Josh Olson can never forget the date of October 27, 2003. The young soldier on duty in Iraq was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade and lost his entire leg. An infantry squad leader, Olson knew immediately that the leg was gone, but says, “I was just happy to be alive!”
Cutting Edge
|
|
 |
Online Education Technology: What We Have, What We Need
Education Outlook
|
|
 |
Independent Networks: Leveling the Playing Field
Leading EDGE
|
|
 |
O&P Aids Animals
Creature Care
|
|
 |
Saddam's Palace Basement Becomes O&P Lab
Global View
|
|
 |
Gary Horton's Goal: Providing a Lifetime of Support for Patients
Industry Leader
|
|
 |
Got FAQs?
Got FAQs?
|
|
 |
US-ISPO Conference Provides Much Food for Thought
Association Spotlight
|
|
 |
CMS Proposes Wheelchair Codes
Association Spotlight
|
|
 |
Jason M. Jennings, CPO
Profile
|
|
 |
ACPOC/Academy Meeting Opens New Dimension
Perspective
|
|
 |
President's Message: Introducing The Academy Today
Viewpoints
|
|
|
 |