Do Your Organizational Dynamics Determine Your Operational Success?
By Meredy DeBorde Literally hundreds of books on as many topics line
the shelves of the business management sections in your local
bookstores and libraries. Boost Productivity! Increase Your Profit
Margins! Manage Your Inventory! Eliminate Inefficiencies! So many
topics command your attention; how do you choose where to begin in
chipping away at the barriers preventing you from gaining a true
competitive edge in your market?
In the October 2005 issue of The O&P EDGE we
addressed the topic of "Leadership vs. Management," as defined by
O&P practitioners and business owners. Ultimately it was
determined that leadership provides a mission, a plan, or a pathway
for those who follow; while management provides the structure,
policies, and procedures by which to accomplish the mission.
Although these definitive descriptions emerged, it must be duly
noted that as with many things in life, sometimes the two find
themselves sharing a common gray area.
We approached this next article in the business series with a
focus on organizational dynamics (OD), recognizing that there are
many factors that affect the dynamics of a group or organization,
such as leadership and management styles, the number of employees,
whether it is family-owned versus publicly traded, the geographic
location as well as the employable population in the area, etc.
Through the participation of a panel of industry professionals, we
only begin to skim the surface by touching on a few major factors
affecting organizational dynamics in the O&P industry.
Organizational Dynamics Defined
An organization is defined as a group of two or more individuals
who work together to accomplish something that typically cannot be
accomplished alone. OD is described as how people function together
to accomplish a task. The level of operational success is said to
be determined by the behavioral nature of
organizations--individuals' roles, interpersonal relations, and
group dynamics, and how they all react when brought together.
Today's businesses face perhaps some of the most difficult
challenges with regard to social responsibility, economic
fluctuation, government regulation, and global competition. Add to
these the challenge of integrating the ever-changing personality of
what is being called by business experts the most diverse workforce
in our nation's history, and the picture of the future looks even
more interesting. Segment the O&P industry from other
businesses and you can begin to see an even greater number of
complexities.
For example, when the question is posed to O&P marketers to
define those who make up the O&P market, there is a plethora of
varying responses. A clear-cut definition of the average
practitioner seems to remain ever elusive, making hiring, managing,
and retaining this individual as an employee a constant work in
progress, not to mention the difficulties that exist in marketing
to him. Understanding the dynamics of a group helps to achieve a
successful outcome.
Leadership: A Social Function
ELEMENTS OF DYSFUNCTION
1) The first dysfunction is an absence of trust
among team members. Essentially, this stems from their
unwillingness to be genuinely open with one another, making it
impossible to build a foundation of trust.
2) This failure to build trust is damaging
because it sets the tone for the second dysfunction: fear of
conflict. Teams that lack trust are incapable of engaging in
unfiltered passionate debate, resulting in guarded comments.
3) A lack of healthy conflict is a problem
because it ensures the third dysfunction: lack of commitment.
Without airing opinions in the course of open debate, team members
rarely or never buy-in and commit to decisions.
4) This lack of buy-in creates an avoidance of
accountability. If there is no commitment to a clear plan of
action, even the most focused people will hesitate to call their
peers on counterproductive behavior.
5) Failure to hold one another accountable
creates an environment where the fifth dysfunction can thrive.
Inattention to results occurs when team members put their
individual or division needs above the collective goals of the
organization.
And so, like a chain with just one link broken, teamwork
deteriorates if even a single dysfunction is allowed to
flourish.
* References taken from The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team--A
Leadership Fable by Patrick Lencioni.
According to Peter F. Drucker, one of the most cited authors on
the topics of leadership and management, the essence of leaders and
managers is to motivate others toward productivity. In Drucker's
words, "Management and leadership are social functions." You heard
right: social functions.
To lead effectively in today's business environment means to
understand your organizational dynamics (how your people get
along); to understand your OD requires a little sociology, a little
psychology, and a lot of talking. You need to be sociable; you need
to find the people-person in you. For more info on assessing your
organization's dynamics see the downloadable pdf provided.
One hundred percent of our panel of industry professionals
responded that within their organizations, the ability to create a
positive dynamic and manage change within the organization was
dependent upon their ability to successfully deliver communication
from the top down, as well as laterally.
Sounds simple enough, right? Not necessarily. Not every
organization is successful in communicating its mission and
objectives, and an organization with a flawless OD is most likely
nonexistent.
Perception thus becomes the perceiver's reality. A business
leader may well think he has successfully communicated a mission to
his employees as they attentively nod along during a
state-of-the-business address or strategic-planning meeting, but
often what has actually happened is a reaction to legitimate power.
Legitimate power, as defined in a number of management textbooks,
is the influence one holds simply due to his official position of
authority or rank.
It is important to remember that just simply holding a position
of leadership doesn't make you a leader, any more than having the
ability to speak makes you a good communicator.
Evaluate the Process
So, as a leader, how do you know if your organization truly
comprehends your message or is simply responding as fearful
subordinates? Ninety percent of the industry panel reported that
they measure and evaluate successful leadership and communication
by the ability of employees to interpret the communication and
carry out the mission through productive teamwork.
Here is a tool you can use to test the functionality of your
team as you observe your organization's dynamic in action. This
test comes from a book titled The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team--A
Leadership Fable by Patrick Lencioni, which addresses the five
main dysfunctions of organizations today.
Does this leave you scratching your head and begging the answer
to this next question, "I understand that these dysfunctions exist,
but why? Where do they come from? Certainly leadership and the
failure to successfully communicate are not the only culprits?"
Of course, leadership and communication styles are not the only
determining factors for a dysfunctional team. But in order to
address the dysfunction, you must understand all of the intricacies
of the team, and realize that part of the responsibility for goal
achievement falls on the shoulders of your employees to understand
your objectives, have a willingness to work cohesively toward a
common goal, and to accept change.
Identifying Change Agents
While technological advances and the needs of the end-user
ultimately determine the pace of change in the O&P industry,
many of our industry professionals acknowledged that they have
witnessed a resistance to change in manufacturing and among
practitioners. If change is truly inevitable, how do you manage it
successfully? Bring on the Change Agents! If you employ them you
are likely to stay on the cutting edge, if you market to them you
are likely to gain the confidence of an influential buying group in
your market, both of which gain you a competitive advantage.
According to Liz Nickels, author of The Change
Agents--Decoding the New Workforce and the New Workplace, "The
digital revolution has caused a bigger shift in society than the
industrial revolution" which consequently resulted in a huge impact
on organizational behavior. We are seeing greater numbers of
transient employees. About this Nickels wrote, "The new-age
employees in big business automatically expect that they will get
top dollar, the latest technology, a beautiful office, their
opinions will count as much as the bosses', and they will not take
no' for an answer." She explains that because this generation was
the first to grow up using an influx of inexpensive Japanese
electronics, they embraced technology and change rather than
fearing it.
Nickels continued, "These employees know they can get another
job immediately, and they don't worry' about losing one. Even in a
down market that has everyone else worried. They still don't worry.
They know they can walk into just about anywhere and present a good
value proposition for them to be working there, and they will be
hired immediately."
That's just youthful arrogance, you say? According to experts on
the subject, it goes much deeper than that.
Researchers suggest this group of new-age employees claims to
have no mentors--in fact, Nickels says they wouldn't sit still for
it. According to the Gen Y2K Study, published in Nickels' book, one
quarter of 16-34 year-olds believe they could run a business
tomorrow, a statistic that shows them as being twice as ambitious
as 35-50 year-olds. Nickels dubbed these youngsters as the Change
Agents, claiming that every generation or period in time has
them--requires them, in fact.
Ask any marketer in O&P, and they will tell you about the
importance of Change Agents. Change Agents are defined as being the
early adopters--the first on the block to try what's new.
Sociologists came up with these questions to help marketers segment
the population psychographically, identifying early adopters:
- Do people come to you for advice on new products?
- Do you like to buy new things even if they aren't proven?
- Do you belong to two or more social groups (clubs, church, book
discussion, sports, etc.)?
- Do you generally like new ideas?
- Are you flexible in your daily life?
- Are you comfortable giving opinions to others?
- Do you feel you have more friends than the average person?
If you answer "yes" to five or more questions, you qualify as an
early adopter or Change Agent. Imagine using this questionnaire in
a job interview to target the hiring of early adopters when
teambuilding; or for you marketers, imagine using it in customer
focus groups.
Nickels concluded by writing, "Change Agents are the
water-testers, the temperature-takers for the rest of us--in
hyperdrive. We watch while they surge at warp speed over the chasm
to--what?--on the other side. And, when they make it, we're right
behind them. Maybe a few paces back, but there."
And this brings up another burning question in your mind: "If
these so-called Change Agents are driving my market and/or driving
the diversity in my workforce, how do I know I can trust where
these young guns are taking me?"
Managing Generational Diversification
Perhaps the most notable point to be made by everyone on the
industry panel is that at the heart of everything in our
organizations are the people. And, all respondents commented on the
importance of finding value in a diverse workforce ranging from
industry veterans to new college graduates brimming with youthful
enthusiasm.
In the book titled, When Generations Collide, by Lynne
C. Lancaster and David Stillman, they wrote, "Generational
differences is one of the fundamental reasons American companies
are experiencing hiring challenges, skyrocketing turnover rates,
increasing communication conundrums, and plummeting morale. Clashes
among Traditionalists, Baby Boomers, Generation Xers, and
Millennials at work could take a direct toll on the bottom
line."
The authors state that generation gaps at work are of perhaps
the greatest strategic importance today for leaders to address,
because we are seeing for the first time in US history four
generations facing off across the conference room table.
Through the Bridge-Works Generations Survey, a large-scale
web-based survey conducted in 2000-2001, Lancaster and Stillman
acknowledge that each generation holds its own set of values,
beliefs, experiences, and attitudes that shape their behaviors at
work.
You say you still don't get why this matters? Let's take a
closer look at what happens when generations collide at work.
According to Lancaster and Stillman's research, "The
ramifications include everything from reduced profitability to the
loss of valuable employees, higher payroll costs, poor customer
service, derailed careers, wasted human potential, and even
potentially serious health problems caused by stress. Corporate
cultures are being shaken to the very core as the cost of human
capital spirals ever upward." Lancaster and Stillman believe that
employers and employees ignore the differences between generations
as a factor that determines OD because we believe that regardless
of our age we all face the same life stages. But the mistake is
made in assuming that every generation handles the life stages in
the same manner.
According to the authors, each generation has its own
generational personality that is shaped by the events and
conditions we experience in our formative years. This shared common
history is what shapes how we see the world and how we relate to
it. Icons are people, places, or things that become reference
points for a generation, such as the assassination of a president,
or the crashing of planes into the World Trade Center. Conditions
are the forces at work in the environment as each generation comes
of age, such as growing up in the breadlines during the Great
Depression or being raised in a single-parent family.
Review this table of the four generations that make up our
dynamic workforce today, as identified and defined by Lancaster and
Stillman's research.
Traditionalist (1900-1945) 75 million
- Grew up during two world wars
- Learned to do without
- Experienced the breadlines
- Hardworking and patriotic
- Learned to value teamwork
- Military-style management
- Chain-of-Command attitude
- One-word description-Loyal
Baby Boomers (1946-1964) 80 million
- Grew up during Watergate and Vietnam
- Learned to distrust government
- Experienced targeted consumerism
- Competitive and idealistic
- Learned to be the Me-generation
- Interpersonal-style management
- Change-of-Command attitude
- One-word description-Optimistic
Generation Xers (1965-1980) 46 million
- Grew up in triple divorce rates
- Learned to count on themselves
- Experienced tabloid exposure of heroes
- Independent and resourceful
- Learned to be self-reliant
- Entrepreneurial management style (dot com)
- Self-Command attitude
- One-word description-Skeptical
Millennials (1981-1999) 76 million
- Grew up during a technology boom
- Learned to value wisdom from elders
- Experienced violence in schools/streets
- Positive, pragmatic, next Greatest Generation
- Learned to accept diversity
- Empowerment management style
- Don't Command-Collaborate attitude
- One-word description-Realistic
To this list of generations we must add a fifth category for
consideration in our diverse workforce. Lancaster and Stillman call
this group the Cuspers . The Cuspers are
individuals who find themselves in between two generations. This
group may often personally feel as though they don't belong, like
they are drifters in the workplace. The research conducted by
Lancaster and Stillman shows that Cuspers fill incredibly important
roles and may well be one of the most important assets corporate
America has access to today. "Because Cuspers find themselves
standing in the gap between two sides, they become naturals at
mediating, translating, and mentoring. Whether designing a career
path, conducting a performance review, or giving day-to-day
feedback, the innate understanding of more than one generation
makes Cusper managers both efficient and effective." Workplaces
need to embrace the abilities of Cuspers, as they are valuable in
strategizing how to recruit and retain, as well as spotting
marketplace and workplace trends that are going to explode in the
next generation. Cuspers have an innate ability to understand
things that others have to work hard to understand, which makes
them easy to talk to and good listeners. According to Lancaster and
Stillman, "They are the only ones who can wear the clothes and use
the language of more than one generation and not look dumb!"
The results of the web-based survey are important to all
business leaders today, but especially to business leaders in
O&P as we look at changes within our industry, as we see new
generations of practitioners, marketers, and amputees.
Conclusion
Having this fundamental understanding of leadership, power,
communication, and the dynamics of your employee base may well help
you apply strategies that not only prevent dysfunctional behavior
and generational collisions in your organizations, but also allow
you to become the best communicator and leader you can be. Forming
a basis for understanding human behavior certainly contributes to
successful implementation of goals and objectives, however
uncomfortable it may be to practice a little psychology or
sociology in viewing leadership as a social function. The ultimate
driving force in OD among the professionals polled for this article
was that we must always follow the Golden Rule, remembering back to
when we were not the leaders and someone else was in charge: Do
unto others as you would have them do unto you. How could this
not contribute favorably to your operational success and bottom
line?
Notable Quotes on Organizational Dynamics
Jim Andreassen, president, OPGA, Waterloo,
Iowa, on change: "We communicate the reason for change, the
direction and goals...making sure everyone in the organization
understands the vision of where the company is going and why. We
make them a part of the plan so they assume ownership.We explain
that change is necessary to remain competitive and be profitable.
Meeting the demands placed upon people during change requires
managing job pressure for yourself and others. Laugh a little.
People who have fun at work are more productive and less anxious
during change."
C. Rudolph Becker IV, vice president of sales
and marketing, Becker Orthopedic, Troy, Michigan, on recruiting:
"The thing that has the greatest impact on our corporate dynamic is
the quality of people we hire and retain at Becker Orthopedic. We
have great confidence in all levels of management and our
workforce. We actively seek their opinions and feel the person
doing a particular job, in most cases, knows the most about that
particular job."
Craig MacKenzie, CP, RTP (c), owner, Velocity
Labs Inc., Orlando, Florida, on inclusion: "It's my belief that if
an organization is allowed to split up into smaller groups, the
workplace can become an us against them' situation. I have been
employed at places that have allowed that to happen. The wall
between technical and clinical is not just physical at these
companies. Technicians or manufacturing staff are referred to as
the guys in the back.' A separation like this is never good.
Manufacturing needs to understand the important roles of the people
in other groups and vice versa. When everyone understands the
importance of every position in the company, decisions made by any
area are more readily adopted."
Maynard Carkhuff, president and COO, Freedom
Innovations, Irvine, California, on individuality: "Internally,
each team member has a unique competitive edge and innate need to
excel in their personalities. These qualities press the company to
continually reevaluate all that we do, so that we will be better
next year in everything we do. Interestingly, these traits that
make us want to do it all' create a dynamic tension in the
organization as we must focus resources on the key issues. We
understand that while we would still like to tackle other issues,
for us to succeed, we must focus on the key critical success
factors in our business-and our customer is always central to this
concept."
Andrew Meyers, president and CEO, Langer Inc.,
Deer Park, New York, on culture: "The value of leadership is
sometimes misunderstood and undervalued. People should spend more
time thinking about it. Too many times people do not understand how
leadership styles can impact a corporate culture. We all make
mistakes-we have to take an introspective view and evaluate why
something didn't work. In order to have successful leadership,
leaders must earn respect, not demand it. They must also live the
culture and values of the organization; if the employees see
otherwise, you won't get the buy-in needed for success."
Meredy DeBorde holds a bachelors degree in organizational
behavior and human resources from the McGregor School of Antioch
University. She has worked in the industry since 1999 in public
relations and advertising for a manufacturer, and now as the
director of sales and marketing for The O&P EDGE. 

Table Of Contents - February 2006
|