Exploring the Phantom Phenomenon from a Psychophysiological Perspective
Jim Price, PhD, CPO |
Introduction:
Phantom limbs in individuals who experience limb loss are characterized
by the sometimes-painful experience of feeling an absent extremity
subsequent to amputation
surgery. Regardless that no conclusive theories have emerged explaining the
causes of phantom limb sensation and phantom limb pain, it has been
suggested that a
neural network within the brain, the body-self neuromatrix, produces an output
pattern that evokes the phantom limb. A historical perspective of the evolution
of pain theories and their contribution to current trends in pharmacological
management of neuropathic pain were examined. Neuromatrix theory along with
psychopathological variables as contributors to the phantom limb
response was investigated. Finally,
contemporary instruments designed to predict the occurrence of phantom pain
and the relevance of those instruments to preventing potentially
deleterious effects
that contribute to phantom pain were considered. Discussion and Conclusion:
Pertinent statistical representations such as those that revealed common
variances among relationships and proportions of significance pertaining
to specific domains of experience were examined. Qualities that did
not share significant common variance with patient satisfaction indicators
were eliminated, while those that did share significant common variance
were examined further. Statistical value of the aforementioned indicators
were assessed and ranked in order of significance using coefficients
of determination revealed through regression analysis. Goals that were
met included: (a) determination of levels of post amputation satisfaction
for the sample in the major domains of life experience, (b) determination
of the extent to which the sample experienced favorable well-being,
(c) determination of the extent to which the major domains shared common
variance with general well-being and phantom pain, and (d) determination
of the proportions of significance of the major domains of life experience
and well-being in their prediction of phantom pain.
Materials and Method:
This quantitative correlation study examined relationships among three
primary predictor variable scores, general well-being scores, and the
scores on a phantom pain survey. The population investigated was those
who had experienced lower extremity amputation. Subjects were limited
to individuals who had completed initial rehabilitation with a prosthetic
limb. The predictor variables examined were (a) physical experience,
(b) social experience, (c) emotional experience, and (d) demographic
predictors. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scales (TAPES)
were used to assess the three primary predictor variables. The criterion
variables, general well-being and phantom pain experience, were operationally
defined and measured by the Beck Depression Inventory II and specific
questions from the TAPES phantom pain survey. A demographic survey was
included and assessed age, gender, diagnostic category, amputation type,
and time elapsed since amputation. Correlation analysis determined the
extent to which the predictor variables and the criterion variables were
related. Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate variances
among the predictor variable scores, general well-being scores, and the
phantom pain survey scores.
Results:
Demographic variables were eliminated as significant predictors of general
well-being or phantom pain. Physical, social, and emotional experiences
of amputation were interrelated and represented 68% of common variance
with general well-being. Physical, social, and emotional experiences
of amputation were relatively statistically equal in predicting levels
of general well-being. The relationship between general well-being and
phantom pain was statistically significant at a 95% confidence level.
Regression analysis revealed 75% common variance between TAPES scores
and depression scores and phantom pain. Proportions of significance revealed
social experience to be an important predictor of phantom pain, followed
by emotional experience and physical experience.
|