Topics
- News
- Clinical
- Technical
- Business
- Legislation
- Billing/Coding
- Innovations
- Associations
- Pediatrics
- Post-Mastectomy
- Research
- Education
- Sports
- Human Interest
- Opinion
- Video
People
- Consumer
- O&P Practitioner
- Student/Resident
- Technician
- Pedorthist
- Manager/Owner
- Manufacturer
- Physical Therapist
- Other Healthcare Professional
Regions
OIG Report Regarding Qualified Providers
Posted By: Wil on October 17, 2012
Hello Colleagues and Guests, I've added a link to the oandpsolutions.org website, compliments of John Billock, regarding the fact that CMS has not promulgated an important federal law related to comprehensive O&P services that was passed by congress over ten years ago. This is a summary of the OIG report regarding this federal regulation and the full text as given to me a few days ago by Ryan Ball is also listed at this site and can be downloaded. This is the kind of information that is very helpful to our cause for fairness with CMS and is helpful to each O&P professional. Although this lack of promulgation was pointed out to CMS by our associations in the past, only now that the OIG has picked up on it, does it seem to become important to CMS. This clearly illustrates that CMS has failed to some extent on their part to help curtail fraud and abuse within the O&P profession, as required by federal law. It further illustrates the importance for each of us to complain to our legislators about the unfair and often unnecessary CMS regulations that are being shoved down the throats of physicians and O&P professionals. While I am at it, I received copy of upcoming CMS regulations that will make your heads swim and it appears that they are on the way to being implemented. The regulations that I perused, will make is very tempting for physicians to stop writing prosthetic and comprehensive orthotic prescriptions when that is possible. When unreasonable and time consuming regulations become the "law of the land," I believe physicians will find ways to lessen their burdens and that will not be good for those needing prosthetic and orthotic care. Third world prosthetic and orthotic care in the U.S. for Medicare recipients may be just around the corner if we don't take the bull by the horns and get some common sense back into the O&P system. I have been asked on more than one occasion how you can support our cause in this Medicare battle for O&P fairness. The short answer is to write your congressional representatives with first hand illustrations of cases where deserving citizens are being denied appropriate O&P care. In other matters, such as prepayment audits, write to them and also to the Small Business Administration Ombudsman Department, complaining about the unfairness that CMS is imposing with the prepayment audits and also the unreasonable regulations regarding the provision of O&P care. Finally, lets all get on board with a plan that helps CMS, the physicians, the patients, and ourselves. This can be done with a coordinated effort starting from the ground up (back at home). My suggestion is that we "insist" that O&P professionals be given the authority to write the definitive CMS compliant prescription, get agreement for same from the attending physician, and then hold the O&P professional accountable for the treatment dispensed. We'll need support from the AMA and, I believe, this is possible given the non-revenue-producing administrative burden that is being levied against physicians regarding the provision of comprehensive O&P care. We need to examine our scope of practice statement and add additional training for the O&P community to make sure that all O&P practitioners are duly trained to provide the evaluations that are being required by CMS. We also need to have CMS curtail unreasonable regulations. A good example of this can be found in an old report by Mayo Clinic wherein they recognize that, for the sake of time, it is not practical to have senior citizens evaluated to the same extent that might be given to a younger person with the same disability. As such, I believe they came up with a condensed version of a strength and gait evaluation that appropriately serves the purposes at hand. It is called the "get up and go test" and is a good example of what common sense solutions can provide. If this test suggests that more testing is required, then fine, we get the appropriate level of additional testing. We need to petition CMS to ensure that they use reasonable regulations regarding O&P care and we need to hold them accountable for their actions, just as they hold us accountable for our actions. Just because some bureaucrat determines such and such documentation is necessary to "prove" medical necessity for O&P care, doesn't mean they are correct. As we all know, it is one thing to talk the talk and quite another to walk the walk. Wil Haines, CPO MaxCare Bionics Avon, IN 46123 |
|
| The message above was posted to OANDP-L, the e-mail discussion list for orthotics and prosthetics. | |

