Topics
- News
- Clinical
- Technical
- Business
- Legislation
- Billing/Coding
- Innovations
- Associations
- Pediatrics
- Post-Mastectomy
- Research
- Education
- Sports
- Human Interest
- Opinion
- Video
People
- Consumer
- O&P Practitioner
- Student/Resident
- Technician
- Pedorthist
- Manager/Owner
- Manufacturer
- Physical Therapist
- Other Healthcare Professional
Regions
Re: 5 year rule
Posted By: Jim Thelen on July 2, 2012
The query about the possible change of the 5 yr rule by medicare has resulted in the following comments. My original question is followed by the comments below. Thanks to all those who took the time to offer help. The consensus was that there has been no change at this time. Jim Thelen, CP, BOCO, LPO Trinidad Medical Consultants Dallas, TX 214-340-6200 Fax 214-340-2206 _____ Original question: Yesterday, I was told by a vendor that the Medicare 5 year rule for > replacement of orthotic devices has been changed to 7 years. Can't find > anything to substantiate that on Medicare website. Can anyone verify or > refute that the rule is now 7 yrs or remains 5 yrs? ____________________________________________________________________________ __________ They may be confusing the time frame that patient records, vendor invoices must be kept on file for audit purposes, we have not heard any differant. ____________________________________________________________________________ __________ Would not shock me, but I have not seen anything regarding this! Seems that they would have to justify a quality change in material studies to show a longer useful lifetime, they should not be pulling this number out of thin air. It has been related to the make up or construct of the item, this is why many knee Orthoses are 3 years, not 5. They understand the rigors of activity at the knee is greater than that associated with the spine. ____________________________________________________________________________ __________ I haven't seen a 7 year rule. ____________________________________________________________________________ __________ Here is what I have on the subject, including the most recent LCD Articles: From the current Knee Orthoses LCD Article, effective July 2012 The following reflects the reasonable useful lifetime of prefabricated knee orthoses: L1810 - 1 year L1820 - 1 year L1830 - 1 year L1831 - 2 years L1832 - 2 years L1836 - 3 years L1843 - 3 years L1845 - 3 years L1850 - 2 years The reasonable useful lifetime of custom fabricated orthoses is 3 years. (Comment: This is only stated in the Knee Orthosis LCD Article, not the AFO-KAFO which to my knowledge is still 5 years) Replacement during the "reasonable useful lifetime," is covered if the item is lost or irreparably damaged. Replacement for other reasons, including but not limited to irreparable wear, during the period of reasonable useful lifetime is denied as noncovered. L-coded additions to knee orthoses (L2275 - L2830, K0672) will be denied as noncovered when the base orthosis is noncovered. From the current AFO-KAFO LCD, effective May 2012 Replacement of a complete orthosis or component of an orthosis due to loss, significant change in the beneficiary's condition, or irreparable accidental damage is covered if the device is still reasonable and necessary. The reason for the replacement must be documented in the supplier's record. The AFO-KAFO policy says nothing about wear and tear. Therefore the 5-year rule applies. PROSTHETICS The Social Security Act was amended several year ago and the 5-year rule no longer applies to Prosthetics. Here are the requirements as stated in the LL Prosthesis LCD: It is recognized that there are situations where the reason for replacement includes but is not limited to: changes in the residual limb; functional need changes; or irreparable damage or wear/tear due to excessive patient weight or prosthetic demands of very active amputees. Repairs to a prosthesis are covered when necessary to make the prosthesis functional. Replacement of a prosthesis or prosthetic component is covered if the treating physician orders a replacement device or part because of any of the following: 1. A change in the physiological condition of the patient; or 2. Irreparable wear of the device or a part of the device; or The condition of the device, or part of the device, requires repairs and the cost of such repairs would be more than 60% of the cost of a replacement device, or of the part being replaced. Replacement of a prosthesis or prosthetic components required because of loss or irreparable damage may be reimbursed without a physician's order when it is determined that the prosthesis as originally ordered still fills the patient's medical needs. [Otherwise] Claims involving the replacement of a prosthesis or major component (foot, ankle, knee, socket) must be supported by a new physician's order. Comment: So bottom line, if the prosthesis still works, still fits, meets the patient's needs and functional levels, it cannot be replaced. (Thank you Susan for you thorough comments. And to everyone else.) Jim Thelen, CP, BOCO, LPO Trinidad Medical Consultants Dallas, TX 214-340-6200 Fax 214-340-2206 |
|
| The message above was posted to OANDP-L, the e-mail discussion list for orthotics and prosthetics. | |

