Topics
- News
- Clinical
- Technical
- Business
- Legislation
- Billing/Coding
- Innovations
- Associations
- Pediatrics
- Post-Mastectomy
- Research
- Education
- Sports
- Human Interest
- Opinion
- Video
People
- Consumer
- O&P Practitioner
- Student/Resident
- Technician
- Pedorthist
- Manager/Owner
- Manufacturer
- Physical Therapist
- Other Healthcare Professional
Regions
gunk question
Posted By: chrisj on May 16, 2012
I am wanting to know if anyone has empirical data on the strength - weight - reliability of "gunk" options listed below. I use coe tray and find it to be extremely strong and easily workable while curing. I am being challenged by another stating seigle and sulcafloc are comparable to that of coe tray....I disagree but would like to have more input from you'll. (By the way if I'm wrong I am not going to admit to the other person...kidding). Thanks in advance. 1. Seiglehartz and sulcafloc 2. Seiglehartz and micro balloons 3. Coe tray plastic (methyl methacrylate) -- Christopher Jones, CPO Rebound Prosthetics, Inc. 1664 Lafayette St Denver, CO 80218 Phone: 303.832.7287 Fax: 303.830.0327 ___________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, and any attachments, is a confidential business communication that may contain proprietary information, and is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, be aware that you have received this document in error and that any discussion, review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message may be prohibited by or actionable under law. If you have received this communication in error, please discard any copies and notify me at [E-mail Address Removed] |
|
| The message above was posted to OANDP-L, the e-mail discussion list for orthotics and prosthetics. | |

